04 April 2015

The Seventh Planet: A Gravity-Assist Tour of the Uranian System (2003)

2006: The Uranian equator is turned nearly edge on to the Sun. Image credit: HST/NASA/ESA/L. Sromovsky
The four largest and most massive satellites of Jupiter are, in order out from the planet, Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto. Io and Europa form a pair of roughly the same size, as do Ganymede and Callisto. Io has a diameter of 3636 kilometers, while Europa, the smallest of the four, is 3138 kilometers in diameter. Ganymede, the largest moon in the Solar System, measures 5262 kilometers across. Callisto, Jupiter's outermost large moon, is 4810 kilometers in diameter.

The presence of four large, massive moons enabled the Galileo spacecraft to carry out a complex tour of the Jupiter system between December 1995 and September 2003. Over the course of 35 revolutions around the giant planet, Galileo used gravity-assist flybys of the four moons to change its orbit.

By contrast, Saturn and Neptune each have only one large, massive moon. Saturn's moon Titan, the second-largest moon in the Solar System, measures 5152 kilometers in diameter, while Neptune's moon Triton is just 2706 kilometers across. The Cassini Saturn Orbiter, at this writing exploring the Saturn system, must rely on Titan for most of its gravity assists, which means that it must rely more often than did Galileo on its finite supply of rocket propellants to make orbital changes. A Neptune orbiter, with only Triton available for significant gravity assists, would face a similar challenge.

The four largest and most massive moons of Uranus are puny compared with Io, Europa, Ganymede, Callisto, Titan, and Triton. Titania, the largest, measures just 1578 kilometers in diameter. The others are: Ariel (1158 kilometers across), innermost of the four moons; Umbriel, 1169 kilometers wide; and Oberon, (1522 kilometers), outermost of the four. Titania orbits between Umbriel and Oberon.

To scale: Voyager 2 images of the five largest moons of Uranus. From left to right in order out from the planet they are Miranda, Ariel, Umbriel, Titania, and Oberon. Image credit: NASA
Though often derided as small and dull, the reality is that the Uranian satellites are little known. Voyager 2, the only spacecraft to visit Uranus, imaged no more than 40% of any Uranian moon as it flew through the system in January 1986. Furthermore, the Cassini Saturn tour has revealed that even small outer Solar System satellites can be surprising: Enceladus, for example, just 505 kilometers wide and by all rights cold and dead, is hot enough inside that it blasts salty water into space from parallel cracks ("tiger stripes") at its south pole at more than 2000 kilometers per hour.

In a paper published in the Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets shortly before Galileo concluded its Jupiter satellite tour, Andrew Heaton of NASA Marshall Space Flight Center and James Longuski of Purdue University demonstrated that the Uranus system could support a complex Galileo-style tour. This was, they acknowledged, "contrary to intuition. . .because the Uranian satellites are much less massive than those of Jupiter."

A Galileo-style tour would be possible, they explained, because "the key to a significant gravity assist is not the absolute size of the satellite, but the ratio of its mass to its primary, and the mass ratios of the Uranian satellites to Uranus are similar to those of the Jovian satellites to Jupiter." Titania and Oberon form a large outer pair similar to Ganymede and Callisto, they noted, while Ariel and Umbriel form a small inner pair equivalent to Io and Europa. The "Uranian system is nearly a smaller replica of the Jovian system," Heaton and Longuski wrote.

To perform their calculations, they relied on "Tisserand graphs" developed at Purdue University in the late 1990s. Their mathematical tool was named for 19th-century mathematician Felix Tisserand, who had calculated the effects of planetary gravity on the motion of comets. Tisserand followed in the footsteps of Anders Johan Lexell, who in the early 1770s had sought to explain the sudden appearance and subsequent disappearance of a previously unknown comet. In 1770, Comet Lexell flew past the Earth at a distance of 2.3 million kilometers.

A previous post detailed how, in the early 1960s, Michael Minovitch used his own graphs and University of California-Los Angeles and JPL computers to calculate dozens of gravity-assist trajectories. His work laid the groundwork for many planetary missions, including the Mariner 10 Venus-Mercury flybys and Voyager 2's Jupiter-Saturn-Uranus-Neptune "Grand Tour." Minovitch did not, however, calculate satellite system tours; presumably this was because in the early 1960s so little was known of outer Solar System moons.

Next in line: Uranus (upper left) as viewed by the Cassini spacecraft in Saturn orbit. Image credit: NASA
Heaton and Longuski described a three-phase, 811-day Uranian system tour. After launch from Earth in March 2008 and a gravity-assist fly-by of Jupiter in September 2009, the Uranus tour spacecraft would fire its main rocket engine to capture into an elliptical Uranus orbit on Valentine's Day in 2018. This would mark the start of the first Uranus tour phase, which would be devoted to matching the plane of the Uranian equator, ring system, and moon orbits.

Uranus is tipped on its side relative to the other planets in the Solar System, and its moons have equatorial orbits. Heaton and Longuski wrote that the Uranian system would appear edge-on to the Sun in 2007, then would tilt gradually until the planet and its moons pointed their north poles at the Sun in 2028.  

The Uranus tour spacecraft would capture into an initial orbit tilted 13.6° relative to the planet's equator and system plane. It would fly past Titania in May 2019 at a distance of 316 kilometers, allowing the largest Uranian satellite to "crank" its orbital plane. A total of nine similar Titania flybys over 261 days would place the spacecraft into the same plane as the Uranian equator, rings, and moons.

The second phase of the Uranus tour, the energy-reduction phase, would see the spacecraft reduce the size of its orbit, thus shortening its orbital period, while at the same time conducting a thorough exploration of the four largest Uranian moons. This would begin 287 days after the spacecraft captured into Uranus orbit with a flyby of Oberon at a distance of 414-kilometers and would proceed through eight Ariel flybys, five Umbriel flybys, three Titania flybys, and four additional Oberon flybys over the course of the next 395 days. 

The spacecraft would pass nearest any world in the Uranian system during this phase. At the start of its 14th revolution about Uranus, almost exactly one Earth year (364.3 days) after arriving at the planet, it would pass just 54 kilometers over Umbriel's icy landscapes.

Miranda's south polar region in 1986: a mosaic of images from Voyager 2. Image credit: NASA
Heaton and Longuski did not include the enigmatic moon Miranda on their list of close flybys because it orbits close to Uranus and, with a diameter of just 480 kilometers (only a little smaller than surprising Enceladus) is less than half the size of Ariel, the smallest moon they employed for gravity assists. Close proximity to Uranus and low mass would mean that Miranda's gravity could contribute little to shaping the Uranus tour. 

Miranda has some of the most intriguing known surface features on the Uranian satellites - for example, Verona Rupes, a five-kilometer-high fault scarp that begins near the edge of the lighted area visible to Voyager 2. Presumably the Uranus tour spacecraft would image Miranda whenever its tour route took it relatively close by.


The third and final phase of the tour would commence 691 days after Uranus arrival with a 151-kilometer Umbriel flyby. The somewhat arbitrary goal of the third phase would be to place the Uranus tour spacecraft into orbit around Ariel. Through three additional Umbriel flybys and four Titania flybys over 120 days the spacecraft would nearly match Ariel's orbit about Uranus, reducing its maximum velocity relative to its target to slightly less than one kilometer per second. The Uranus tour spacecraft would then briefly fire its rocket motor to slip into orbit about Ariel.


Source

"Feasibility of a Galileo-Style Tour of the Uranian Satellites," A. Heaton and J. Longuski, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Volume 40, Number 4, July-August 2003, pp. 591-596.

More Information

The Challenge of the Planets, Part Three: Gravity

6 comments:

  1. Would like to see this, but not sure my lifetime will extend so far.

    Curious if your research shows any drawing board concepts/proposals for multiple landers among planetary orbiting probes? Seems today, I could encapsulate my iPhone in a rugged clear ball (softball size?) with a charged battery and antenna and send back a few days worth of surface photos and measurements. Put a few charges in the ball of bottle-rocket strength for some bounces around the surface(s) for a couple location samples. With about say 20 (or 100?) such mini-probes, the science ROI would increase quite a bit.

    I don't think this was quite possible when the design plans for Galileo or Cassini were laid out.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This reminds me of a couple of things - the Block II Ranger rough-landing capsules and the Mars tumbleweeds.

      dsfp

      Delete
    2. What you've described could be accomplished by deploying a "swarm" of thin film spacecraft onto the surfaces of moons that then relay data via the main orbiter back to Earth.

      http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/716074main_Short_2011_PhI_Printable_Spacecraft.pdf

      Delete
  2. Congrats on your new blog.

    I imagine one of the challenges of the Uranus mission was/is the dwindling supply of RTG fuel. What happens to outer-solar-system exploration without plutonium?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks!

      I think the idea behind this study is that a gravity-assist tour of the Uranian moons is feasible in terms of celestial mechanics. The Pu shortage was not as acute as now and that wasn't really the idea behind the study anyway. They didn't propose a specific spacecraft design, for example.

      Jupiter exploration seems still do-able without RTGs; small comfort, I know, even if it is a fascinating place.

      dsfp

      Delete
  3. http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21647585-america-resumes-production-plutonium-238-keep-space-within-reach-nasas-dark

    So...
    1. The US has about 17Kg of useful Pu-238 now.
    2. Production will yield 1.1 to 1.5 Kg annually through 2021
    3. Curiosity (for comparison) uses 4.8 Kg. Cassini used 33Kg. (Whoa!)
    4. 87-year half-life.

    How did we at one time have 10s of Kgs of PU-238, how was it consumed? Was it the weapons production of the 1950s through 1970s? Is there an alternate nuclear fuel (How much does a Stirling Generator use?) Does this not encourage or justify fission reactors in space use? I kind of think this drives ideation of compact fission (or fusion, Lockheed-Martin?) reactors in space. But would the environmental lobby ever allow it?

    Does Pu-238 production create lots nasty isotopes that require special disposal?

    ReplyDelete

I like hearing from my readers. No rules except the obvious ones - please keep it civil and on topic.